Konuk Yazar, 6 Aðustos 2003

Pembe Mentesh

 

Peace movements and the media

New Page 1

A comparative analysis of case studies from Cyprus and the former Yugoslavia

 

The peace movements in (and for) the former Yugoslavia and Cyprus are interesting examples of how movements are born and evolve out of various concepts of identity. The impact of the media on these movements can be examined based on the relationship between social movements and models of power. The use of mainstream, alternative, and social movement media will determine how effectively these peace movements communicate their messages to the local and international community, as well as how they will mobilise for collective action. In the information age, peace movements are finding a voice and a tool for organising within the boundless world of the Internet but the challenge is to use this power for real political, social, and cultural change within the communities they live in.

The splitting up of the former Yugoslavia into separate states in the early nineties was characterised by extensive bloodshed, NATO bombing, and a continuous stream of media propaganda on all parts. “The Croatian secessionists and the Bosnian Muslims hired an American public relations firm, Ruder Finn, to advance their causes by demonising the Serbs” (Johnstone, 1999). In Serbia, “…the media role in mounting the nationalistic campaign became paramount” (Biserko, 1997). The secessionists were in effect, adopting one of the media filters of Herman and Chomsky’s Propaganda Model - Anticommunism as a control mechanism.  As an ideology, this helps those in power with creating enemies out of those people or countries that go against so called western ideals and politics. (Herman & Chomsky, 1988). In fact, it has been argued that the defeat of communism opens up the world market to American capital and enterprise. This economic globalisation process shifts power away from elected governments (Johnstone, 1999).

To borrow from Michael Mann’s three models of power which determine movements’ relationship with the media (see Appendix 1 - Policy and media outcomes of social protest by models of media-state relations) the pure elitism model where the ruling elite controls the political and media agenda would have made it difficult for peace movements at the time to communicate their messages. They might have been silenced or marginalised by the state owned media. Since opting for democracy three years ago, the Serbian Government still hasn’t developed the media sector or reviewed media operations under the previous regime (Matic et al, 2003). During the war, even those independent media who used to report objectively, began to ignore the atrocities that were taking place in Bosnia (Biserko, 1997). So even the so called liberalisation of the media or the development of new independent media did not guarantee the war, or the peace movements against it would be granted the coverage necessary at the time.

As a result of these power dynamics and with the lack of common aims for the various peace movements in the former Yugoslavia it is difficult to envisage how they might begin to effect change in their new societies. “The Serbian peace movement’s goal has been to stop all the killing. The other peace movements have focused on stopping Serbian atrocities by whatever means they can” (www.notfrisco.com). Add to this the inconsistency of external peace movements, and the situation in the former Yugoslavia worsens. In an open letter to global peace movements in 1994, the former Yugoslav peace groups announced, “Our common stand is that mass actions of visiting these territories…are ineffective and a waste of energy. During a short period, a large number of participants can’t really…articulate any political message except general opposition to war” (www.wri-irg.org).

The construction of identity proposed by Manuel Castells could be used as a basis for understanding the different ways in which peace movements in the former Yugoslavia were (and are) framed. The Serbian majority could be characterised with a “legitimising identity” where the dominant institutions justify their authority and domination. This also fits in with the idea of nationalism (Castells, 1997: 8). The secessionists could be seen to have “project identities” (evolving out of “resistance identities”) in that they aim to build a “new identity that redefines their position in society…and seek the transformation of overall social structure” (Castells, 1997: 8). Serbian nationalism is no different from the nationalism in the various states that define themselves according to religion and ethnicity (eg. Muslims in Bosnia and Albanians in Kosovo). They are just cultural rather that political. In this sense, they are in “defense of an already institutionalised culture than toward the construction or defense of a state. When new political institutions are created…they are defensive trenches of identity, rather than launching platforms of political sovereignty.” Furthermore, “cultural nationalism is concerned with the distinctiveness of the cultural community as the essence of a nation” (Castells, 1997: 31).

In pushing the agendas of their individual identities, it would be easy to make a generalisation that the peace movements in the former Yugoslavia are suffering as a result. This lack of cohesion based on cultural/religious differences would certainly have an impact on the extent to which these movements can achieve their aims. But apart from that, they are also suffering from a serious lack of resources and funding for the development and distribution of social movement and alternative media. The financial burden created by the war in the former Yugoslavia has made it difficult for peace movement groups to carry out their work, especially within the realm of independent media. In sourcing international NGO or foreign government funding, “the champions of independent media need to keep exaggerating the perils of their situation in order to attract ongoing financial backing from the West” (Johnstone, 1999).  This could open the door for subliminal uses of the filters mentioned by Herman and Chomsky above, within the alternative media, by the West. In many of the new states, secessionist movements and ethnic guerilla armies would also contribute to making the work of the peace movements difficult. 

At present, the Serbian Government is trying to introduce a parliamentary amendment for the establishment of a state news agency, despite public opinion against this (Matic et al, 2003). As the democratization of the media in the former Yugoslavia occurs, scant resources are being used to establish or continue existing alternative media sources. Some examples include:   

·         Press Now – A web portal for independent media in former the Yugoslavia (Bosnia, Croatia, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Slovenia, and Vojvodina)

·         AIM (Alternative Information network) – A network of independent journalists in the former Yugoslavia who provide information in local languages and English. Although supported by the council of Europe and various foreign governments, they are currently facing an economic crisis and may cease to exist)

·         Medienhilfe – Founded in 1992, this Swiss NGO aims to support the independent media and freedom of press in the former Yugoslavia.

·         Balkan Media & policy Monitor – A bi-monthly publication sponsored by NGO’s in The Netherlands.

·         An Independent Serbian language newspaper in Kosovo – This is a project of the Cambridge foundation for Peace to serve the needs of the Serbian minority in Kosovo.

In contrast, the peace movements in Cyprus that are striving for re-unification are framed according to identity based on nation, regardless of ethnicity or religion. Their role is to challenge the political hegemony that tends to ignore the public, revive collective identity, and demonstrate the need for peaceful co-existence if Cyprus as a whole, is to become a legitimate member of the international community in the lead up to EU accession. The Republic of Cyprus in the south will enter the EU north in May 2004 with or without their Turkish Cypriot counter parts.

This has given the dormant peace movements on both sides of the UN green line an opportunity to mobilise for re-unification, peaceful co-existence and demilitarisation. A highlight within Technology for Peace (a web portal for peace movement groups) is the “Citizens Movement for Re-unification and Co-existence”.  For the first time since the Greek and Turkish Cypriots were divided, this movement raises awareness amongst the Greek Cypriot population of the struggle faced by their compatriots in the North. It recognizes that Turkish Cypriots have not been adequately supported by Greek Cypriots and that  “there exists a great need for a dynamic, effective and visible citizens movement for re-unification and co-existence within the Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot community in Cyprus and abroad” (www.tech4peace.org). The “Citizens Movement for Re-unification and Co-existence” mobilised with other groups to hold demonstrations on key dates when the two leaders were meeting as part of the UN peace talks. This marks a turning point in Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot relations, with one side acknowledging the isolation, poverty and marginalisation of the other.

Hands Across the Divide, a women’s peace movement, on both sides of Cyprus engage in parallel collective action where joint or bi-communal action is deemed impossible due to the partition lines. For example, demonstrations were held on each side of the island during key dates for the UN peace talks. Women on both sides with candles, released white doves and white balloons as a form of symbolic action. They carried placards with the same message in Greek, English and Turkish.

To apply Michael Mann’s models of power to the relationship between peace movements in Cyprus and the media (see Appendix 1 - Policy and media outcomes of social protest by models of media-state relations) you could say that it is a mixture of pure elitism and institutional elitism. On the one hand, peace movements can exist but are treated with indifference in the mainstream media if they are mentioned at all. On the other hand, a policy agenda of repression seeks to marginalise or even eradicate these movements and their media by framing them as traitors. For example, the alternative daily “Avrupa” (now reborn as “Afrika”) was forced to close down in 2002 after a year of victimisation by the authorities, including raids, fines and “anonymous” death threats. The editor and another journalist were jailed for six months for “possibly upsetting the president in his conduct of his duties” (www.rsf.org). The organizational aims of Afrika correspond to the aims of the peace movements. In listing their demands they declare them as the demands of the Turkish Cypriot people whilst denouncing the negotiations being made by the Turkish Cypriot government on their behalf. We will see later how the strength of the peace movements in Cyprus has facilitated mobilisation around the issues of press freedom – an important issue for all social movements.

As new social movements, the peace movements in Cyprus are defined by their desire for cultural change. They cut across the fabric of Cypriot society and have as their members people who share a common aim regardless of class, gender or ethnicity. “They champion the interests of those who experience social, political and cultural oppression, whatever their economic circumstances” (Burgmann, 1993:5).

The concept of peace in Cyprus is shaped by the peace movements’ aim for recognition of the cultural ideals of its members. Without this, the prospects of a solution are diminished. “A social movement is at once a social conflict and a cultural project. This is as true of dominant movements as it is of dominated movements. The goal of a social movement is always the realisation of cultural values as well as victory over a social adversary” (Touraine, 1995:240). So in this sense, when groups such as the “Citizens Movement for Re-unification and Co-existence” call upon the leaders to agree on a political solution, they are also contributing to the “development and propagation of the culture and principles of understanding and co-existence between people irrespective of their ethnic origin, religion, gender…”(www.tech4peace.org). This aligns with Touraine’s idea that new social movements defend the identity and dignity of those who experience oppression (Touraine, 1995:247).

It also corresponds with Castells’ concept of cultural nationalism which aims to “regenerate the national community by creating, preserving, or strengthening a people’s cultural identity when it is felt to be lacking or threatened (Castells, 1997: 31). For Cypriots, reunification is not just about EU membership. It is about the desire of the people to roam free in their own country, to live without the fear of military attack, and to participate in a legitimate nation. For Turkish Cypriots living in a self proclaimed republic, recognised only by Turkey, possible annexation to Turkey (by Turkey) is seen as a further violation of their freedom and takes them even further away from the country to which they belong.

These ideals are also favoured by the peace movements in the former Yugoslavia, although collective identity, participation in the European and world economy, as well as the desire to live in a peaceful (demilitarised) society are obviously seen as a natural progression after de-unification, or breaking away from the nation state.

The project identities of the peace movement in the former Yugoslavia, can also be applied to the peace movements in Cyprus in that they are both building new identities and seeking changes in the social structure (Castells, 1997: 8).

The use of media by peace movements in Cyprus differs in a number of ways to the use of the media by peace movements in the former Yugoslavia.

Firstly, the financial difficulties being faced by the independent/alternative media are not as severe in Cyprus as they are in the former Yugoslavia. The war, which resulted in the partition of Cyprus into north and south, occurred in 1974 and although in the north there is poverty and disadvantage resulting from the Turkish Cypriot isolation, the unions and social movements have picked up and have been organising for years. The war in the former Yugoslavia which divided the nation occurred more than a decade ago but it is still fresh in the minds of the people and in some states the media (especially independent) and other sectors are finding it difficult to stay afloat. Both countries receive financial aid from foreign NGO’s and governments. Media projects in the former Yugoslavia were mentioned above. In Cyprus, apart from those already mentioned, others include:

·         CyprusMediaNet – a portal for alternative news sources in Greek, Turkish and English sponsored by the Cambridge Foundation for Peace.

·         Hamamboculeri – a Turkish web-based magazine supported by the Pennsylvania University, Science and Technology Wing.  

Secondly, the cultural unity and common aims of the Cypriot peace movement’s have paved the way for an extensive range of internet based resources and web portals that form the foundation for collective action. Most of these web portals have media sections with up-to-date independent reports as well as news or links to alternative media stories in support of the peace movements’ aims. Examples include www.tech4peace.org and www.lobbyforcyprus.org. In the former Yugoslavia the different aims of the various states has inhibited the proliferation of peace movement specific internet expansion as well as social movement specific media.

Finally, radical journalists who also act as prolific peace movement activists in Cyprus, serve to further the aims of both. For example, when radical journalists and unionists were sued for participating in a strike in support of a journalist who was jailed, parallel collective action took place with demonstrations on both sides of the border. As a form of symbolic action, the radical journalists and other members of peace movements “closed their mouths with black tape to protest the repression of the regime in the north” (Uludag, 2003). Greek Cypriot trade unions and members of the Cyprus Journalists Union sent representatives to the border in support of the protest action. This is an example of effective mobilisation, which would not have been possible without the existing communication networks developed by the peace movement. Examples of similar events in the former Yugoslavia, where peace movement aims differ from state to state, have been difficult to find.

In countries where political hegemony influences the mainstream media (particularly state owned media in former communist nations like Yugoslavia) social movements can become marginalized within the media. This is why radical alternative media emerge as a mechanism for the exchange of ideas counter to those represented in the mainstream media. In this sense, they serve as agents for change (Downing, 2001: 44). These radical media organizations often reflect, in their organizational structure and reporting style, those same social movement groups they aim to give a voice to (Atton, 2002: 492). This creates a counter discourse to the mainstream media in the same way that social movements are also counter hegemonic. “Radical media may be characterised by their attempts to free themselves from the power of government, the state and other dominant institutions and practices” (Atton, 2002:495). Thus, alternative media are pivotal to the achievement of the aims of social movements as we can see from the examples above in the former Yugoslavia, and particularly in Cyprus.

The use of the Internet as a medium for alternative and radical media is becoming more and more important in the Information Age. As a relatively inexpensive medium, it is also free from government and corporate agendas which shape mainstream news. In fact, “people who participate in posting and debating information on the Internet occupy a discursive realm outside of mainstream media” (Downing, 2001:223). Most importantly, the use of Internet based alternative radical media, and social movement media, as well as direct e-communication, can result in effective collective action as seen in the Cyprus example.

“By providing…access to social interaction and organisational participation, the internet facilitates the direct, non-mediated transformation of individual attitudes into social actions, so that collective behaviour can be better kept in pace…with the demands of individuals and the goals of very small-scale microsocial groups” (Geser, 2001).

So as the democratisation of the mainstream media occurs (or doesn’t occur) in countries such as Cyprus and the former Yugoslavia, marginalised peace movements can further their aims through the use of radical alternative media. In an information age, one of the most accessible communication mediums for social movements is the Internet. Despite ethnic differences, peace movements in the former Yugoslavia can emulate the solidarity of the movements in Cyprus to bring peace to the region, and not just individual states.

“It is in these back alleys of society, whether in alternative electronic networks or in grassroots networks of communal resistance, that I have sensed the embryos of a new society, laboured in the fields of history by the power of identity” (Castells, 1997: 362).

References

Ackerman, S (1999) Redefining Diplomacy at www.fair.org

Atton, C. (2002) News Cultures and New Social Movements: radical journalism and the mainstream media in Journalism Studies Vol 3 (4)

Biserko, S (1997) Reporting from the writing fields, or “How to prepare genocide in five years” at www.balkansnet.org

Burgmann, V. (1993) Power and Protest. Movements for change in Australian society. Allen and Unwin, Sydney.

Castells, M (1997) The power of identity. Blackwell, Malden.

Downing, J.D.H (2001) Radical Media. Rebellious Communication and Social Movements. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications

Geser, H (2001) On the Functions and Consequences of the Internet for Social Movements and Voluntary Association in Sociology in Switzerland Online Publications www.socio.ch/movpar/t_hgeser3.htm

Herman, E.S. & Chomsky, N. (1988) Manufacturing Consent. The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York, Pantheon Books

Johnstone, D (1999) Seeing Yugoslavia through a dark glass: politics, media and the ideology of globalisation in Covert Action Quarterly Spring Summer 1999 No 67 www.emperors-clothes.com

Mann, M in Sampedro, V. 2000, Media and Social Movements: an Agenda-Building Perspective in Formations Online www.formations2.ulst.ac.uk/documents

Matic, et al (2003) Media in Serbia at www.medienhilfe.ch

Scalmer, S (2002) Dissent Events. UNSW Press, Sydney.

Touraine, A. (1995) Critique of Modernity. Blackwell, Oxford.

Uludag, S. (2003) Annual General Report of Hands Across the Divide.

 

www.aimpress.org

www.cfp-web.metacanvas.com

www.cyprusmedianet.com

www.lobbyforcyprus.org

www.mediafilter.org

www.notfrisco.com

www.peacewomen.org

www.rsf.org

www.stwing.upenn.edu/~durduran/hamambocu/authors

www.tech4peace.org

www.wri-irg.org

 

 

 

 

Bibliography

 

Anthias, F. and Lazaridis, G. (2000) Gender and Migration in Southern Europe. Women on the Move. Berg, Oxford.

 

Altschull, J.H. (1995) Agents of Power. The Media and Public Policy. New York, Longman Publications.

 

Burton, G. (1999) Media and Popular Culture. London, Hodder and Stoughton.

 

Braman, S. and Sreberny-Mohammadi, S. (1996) Globalisation, Communication and Transnational Civil Society.  New Jersey, Hampton Press

 

Craig,G. (2002) The spectacle of the street. An analysis of media coverage of protests at the 2000 Melbourne World Economic Forum in Australian Journal of Communication Vol 29 (1)

 

Dunne, S (2002) Nice dissent from Ireland. ZMagazine Online, November 2002, V15:11 www.zmag.org

 

Dixit, K. (1997) Dateline Earth: Journalism as if the planet mattered. Philippines, Inter Press Service.

 

Fraser, N. (1997) Justice Interruptus, Critical reflections on the ‘post-socialist’ condition. Routledge, New York.

 

Jeong, H. (2000) Peace and Conflict Studies. An Introduction. Ashgate, Aldershot.

 

Payiatsos, A. (2003) interviewed by Peter Taaffe Can the UN peace plan bridge Cyprus’ national divide? in Socialism Today  Issue 73, March 2003. www.socialismtoday.org

 

Woollacott, M (2003) Free movement may still heal the division of Cyprus. The Guardian, London, 9 May.

 


Appendix 1: Policy and media outcomes of social protest by models of media-state relations.

 

 

 

MODEL OF POWER

 

 

POLICY AGENDA

 

MEDIA AGENDA

 

Pure elitism

 

 

(a) Inactivity

 

 

(a) Silence

 

(b) Repression

 

 

(b) Marginalisation

 

Pluralism

 

 

Political innovation

 

Coverage of protest and/or of official controversy

 

Institutional elitism

 

 

(a) Co-option

 

 

(a) Institutionalisation of social movement sources.

Sensationalism.

 

(b) Institutional marginalisation of conflict

 

 

(b) Indifference

 

(Michael Mann in Sampedro, 2000)

 

copyleft (c) 2001-03 hamamboculeri.org