Some thoughts on "Weaver of Hate," the Feb. 17 episode of NYPD Blue, after a quick summary: ------------------------------------------------------ When the father of a murder victim starts tossing around racial epithets, Fancy loses his cool and nearly jeopardizes the investigation; Jill and Greg investigate an immigrant bigamist who slaughtered one wife and stuffed her into a fridge; Diane miscarries the baby she and Bobby made ------------------------------------------------------- Of all the various recurring themes of NYPD Blue, racism has always been the show's automatic slam dunk. No matter how big a creative slump the show may be in, all the writers usually need to pull out of it is get Fancy and Sipowicz nose-to-nose over a slur or perceived slur. "Weaver of Hate" had that kind of conflict in spades, as well as a devastating loss for Bobby and Diane and a solid secondary case to keep Greg and Jill busy. Instant classic, right? Maybe, maybe not. For me, all the superlative acting by James McDaniel, Jimmy Smits, Dennis Franz and Kim Delaney -- not to mention the usual brilliance of secret weapon Paris Barclay's -- gets muddled by my opinion of Fancy's actions. Specifically, I'm not sure that the guy we've been exposed to for the past four and a half years would have flown that far off the handle over this incident. If I buy that premise, then this hour clicks on all cylinders; if I don't, nearly all of the main story falls apart. What do we know about Arthur Fancy? He's a pro, a consumate pro. He runs the squad efficiently, but without micromanaging. He's advanced through the ranks of a department where he's been exposed to racism on a regular basis, and part of that advancement has come through his ability to keep his cool when bigoted jerks start spouting off around him because he knows he can't change the world and has to look out for himself. (There's an episode from the second season called "Innuendo" where Fancy gives his kid brother, a uniform cop with a chip on his shoulder about white people, a lengthy lesson on when to speak and when to keep your mouth shut that illustrates this point better than I can here, and it's due up in the FX rotation in a few days.) Now, he's flown off the handle before when confronted with racism, notably in last year's "Taillight's Last Gleaming," and I can understand him being visibly upset by Weaver's comments, and maybe even can buy him yelling at Weaver the first time, but bringing the guy back in just to humiliate him? Especially when it could (and did) jeopardize the case? That doesn't seem like the Fancy we've gotten to know over the years, and it distracted me throughout much of the show. Which is a shame, because so many of the other elements were working perfectly. The miscarriage subplot, in addition to bringing an annoying thread to an end (more on that in a minute), worked a neat trick: because Bobby was so distracted by Diane's stomach pains, there was no way he was going to say a word about Fancy's behavior, leaving that job up to Andy, who is about the last man on Earth whom Fancy wants to be lectured by on this subject. In seasons past, when these two proud men would butt heads over race, Fancy would almost always be arguing from a higher moral ground. Here, not so much; yes, Weaver's comments were vile and his parenting probably got his kid killed, but he was also a grieving father venting. And from a pragmatic standpoint, Andy had the right idea: cringe inwardly if you're offended, but otherwise shut up and try to get any useful information out of the guy that you can. It gave a new twist and a new urgency to the familiar Sipowicz/Fancy dynamic, and made each of their confrontations a scorcher -- except, of course, that in the back of my head I was thinking, 'What's the matter with Fancy?' A while back, I said that "It Takes A Village" looked like a good bet to be Jimmy Smits' Emmy submission tape. Not anymore. If he can't get an award for this show, I doubt he ever will. I can think of few people in the business who can convey the pain of loss with no dialogue better than Mr. Smits, and this may be the best I've ever seen him. I've never been a fan of the Diane pregnancy saga, and when she first told Bobby that she had lost the baby, I maliciously snickered, "About damn time." Then I looked at Smits, and I stopped laughing. The man is good. The man is very good. He was even better in the locker room at the end, which is the kind of scene we used to see regularly -- two disasters converging instead of the usual one -- but which has become an unfortunate rarity as the series has moved on. The way the scene was choreographed was brilliant, with Sipowicz and Fancy each unwittingly blocking one of the two exits so that Bobby had to stay there and listen to their sniping, until finally he had had so much that he just exploded -- which, conveniently, provided him a path to the door. Slam-bang-pow; it doesn't get much better than that. With all the other sturm und drang of the episode, Greg and Jill's case mostly slipped under the radar, but it was a rare instance where the B-case had some kind of thematic tie to the A-case. Where Fancy's humiliation of Weaver nearly killed that investigation, Jill hit her perp right where he lived, fanning the flames of his own sexism until he lost his temper and confessed. And this Kirkendall/Medavoy partnership is working so well -- Medavoy never seems more competent than when these two team up -- that I hope it becomes permanent when Martinez comes back (see below). Of course, the idea of a Russell/Martinez team doesn't really excite me -- they're the two characters the writers have the least idea of what to do with as cops -- but if it means the end of the stupefying M&M team, I'll take it. So, to wrap up this longer-than-usual review of a much-better-than-usual episode, I reiterate my main point: if I buy Fancy's behavior as in character, this episode goes down as a truly great one. But I'm not sure I do. Some quick hits: -A bunch of people have asked me this in e-mail, and since the latest FAQ update is a few days away, minimum, here's the quickest answer possible: Nick Turturro has not left the show. He's taken a few weeks off to play Sammy "The Bull" Gravano in an NBC miniseries that will air in May. He'll be back eventually, and in the meantime, Martinez is recuperating at home from a bad back. -Looks like all the drama of the hour cut into the planned time to reintroduce Bill Brochtrup as Upstairs John. Let's see how his presence is handled in coming weeks (i.e., do they reshoot his return scenes? Do they splice in whatever got cut into a future episode? Do they just assume the viewers can envision a better return scene than the one they shot, and go from there?) Dolores the Chain-Smoker barely appeared this week, much to my liking. -Andy seemed in much better spirits this week, with nary a mention of his prostrate difficulties. Hmm... -Speaking of health, since Andy knew Diane was feeling some discomfort in her stomach, would zinc cough drops be the way to go? -The return of the Line of the Week!: "Now's not the time to be breaking Fancy's shoes." "That was equivalent shoe-breaking." -Simone & Sipowicz Apologies for the lateness of this review, but I've been watching the Olympics all day, every day, for the last two weeks. It's killin' me... See ya in the funny papers... Alan Sepinwall * e-mail: sepinwal@force.stwing.upenn.edu NYPD Blue page: http://www.stwing.upenn.edu/~sepinwal/nypd.html RANDOM QUOTE: "As my old Pappy used to say, if the Lord had more respect for money, he'd have given it to a better class of people." -James Garner, "Maverick" (the TV series)